Archive | Draft Strategies RSS feed for this section

Baseball Prof's 2011 NFBC Fantasy Baseball Draft: Rounds 1-15

As fantasy baseball experts, and professors, we naturally look for as many possible ways to challenge ourselves during the baseball season. My favorites are usually “Beat the Streak,” where you choose one hitter every day and try to beat Joe Dimaggio’s 56-game hit streak, and joining obscure leagues with strangers and dominating them. Over the years, we have taken part in countless leagues but this year we decided to up the ante.

That’s right. The professors are doing fantasy baseball—NFBC style.

If you aren’t familiar with the NFBC—National Fantasy Baseball Championship—it’s basically somewhere where fantasy nerds can get together and play for keeps. And by keeps, I mean a bit higher stakes than marbles. They also hold live drafts in select remote locations, but unfortunately we are all on a tight budget these days. You know, the economy…

So we decided to put our heads together and co-co-(tri?) manage a team and see if we can come out on top. With three brains behind the operations of our team (Da Professors, by the way) we already have three times the advantage over the competition. We can’t lose!

Before I dive into analyzing our draft, you must know our league rules. ALWAYS KNOW YOUR LEAGUE RULES BEFORE DRAFTING! Knowledge is power.

League: Rotisserie, 15 teams, mixed

Draft: Slow snake draft, 50 rounds

Starting positions: 2 Catchers, 1 First Baseman, 1 Second Baseman, 1 Third Baseman, 1 Shortstop, 1 Corner Infielder, 1 Middle Infielder, 5 Outfielders, 1 Utility, and 9 Pitchers

Categories: Standard 5×5

It’s a very deep league and we think it will give you a real insight into our strategy for drafting accordingly. We are ready and up for the challenge so let’s get into the first fifteen rounds (225 picks) of this monster draft.

The Draft

Round One (Pick 14) – David Wright, 3B, New York Mets

Around the sixth pick we decided that our top targets at 14 would be David Wright, Matt Holliday or Matt Kemp given the scarcity at third base and outfield this year. Only problem was Wright was a pipe dream because in such a deep league his value is clearly higher than normal, but then something happened. Alex Rodriguez and Ryan Zimmerman were draft with the two picks before us and Wright fell into our laps. Ureka! We just got someone who not only contributes in all five categories, but filled in at a scarce position. Now we won’t have to reach on Adrian Beltre in the third round, which is always a good feeling.

Round Two (Pick 17) – Matt Holliday, OF, St. Louis Cardinals

We set Wright and Holliday as our top two targets and got them both. We are feeling pretty good right about now because we now have an elite player at third base and outfield and have shored up our batting average. Both hitters should hit in the .300-range and are five-category fillers. We thought about Kemp and Josh Hamilton at this point, but Holliday is much safer and you don’t win leagues in the first three rounds, but you sure can lose them.

Round Three (Pick 44) - Kendry Morales, 1B, Los Angeles Angels

There’s a bit of a misconception about the first base position this year. Yes it’s deep, but it’s also very top heavy with a fairly steep dropoff, which is why we went with Kendry Morales here. You don’t want to wait too long and have to rely on another Paul Konerko surprise or hope for Billy Butler to finally develop some legitimate power. Even Justin Morneau is a huge question mark given his concussion. Morales missed almost all of 2010, but it was a fluke injury and he is good for 30 home runs and 100 RBI with upside to do more damage than that. He is also another good batting average to add to our already strong mix.

Round Four (Pick 47) – Jon Lester, SP, Boston Red Sox

In such a deep league we thought having an elite pitcher was a must and since there are 26 picks in between our selections it was finally time to nab one. Cliff Lee was just taken with one of the “cream filling” picks (if our 44th and 47th selection are the outer cookie layers, then picks 45 and 46 are the cream filling—it’s like an Oreo, try to keep up) so we were left to choose between Jon Lester, Justin Verlander and Zack Greinke. We pegged Greinke with the WHIP advantage and Verlander atop the strikeout totem pole, but we thought Lester was a very close second in both and had the edge in ERA, while playing on the best team. Greinke was a close runner-up just because his upside in the National League is tremendous, but Lester is also a perennial Cy Young candidate who has no weak link in his game.

Round Five (Pick 74) – Ichiro Suzuki, OF, Seattle Mariners

If you recall from earlier this year I wrote a rather harsh article about Ichiro Suzuki and called for the world to stop drafting him as a top 10, or even top 20, outfielder. Well our leaguemates must be reading the site because he fell all the way to 21st among outfielders in the draft. We realized we needed some steals and debated whether or not to draft someone like Juan Pierre later, but when you have such a big gap between picks you need to take what you need when you are up because it is impossible to predict how the next 26 picks will go. Very important lesson here—there is no such thing as reaching in a deep league in a scenario like this. Get what you need when you have the chance, never play the guessing game. In shallow leagues you can afford to guess because there are more players available to draft.

We grabbed Ichiro and got a .300 batting average—with over 700 plate appearances—and at least 35 steals. He only scored 74 runs last year, but that was the perfect storm of bad offense around him. He should get at least 90, right?

Round Six (Pick 77) – Matt Cain, SP, San Fransisco Giants

Time for our first big debate. Hey, with three opinionated minds it was bound to happen at some point right? Matt Cain or Yovani Gallardo…we spent a good 20 minutes on the subject and finally settled on Cain. The reason? Can has pitched 200-plus innings for four straight seasons, while Gallardo has missed time in each of the last two seasons and always seems to fall apart in the second half. Gallardo gives you a lot of strikeouts  (9.7 K/9 in 2010) and he made huge strides in improving his control last year. Still, he hasn’t put together a full season and it’s not like Cain kills you in strikeouts (career 7.4 K/9). We’ll take Cain and his inexplicable pitching success.

Round Seven (Pick 104) – Aaron Hill, 2B, Toronto Blue Jays

I feel like Aaron Hill is becoming my poster boy for why you shouldn’t draft a second baseman in the first 8-10 rounds of a standard 10-team league. We were able to take on Hill’s batting average risk, although we peg him to be in the very reasonable .270-range, and we are rewarded with great power at a position where there isn’t much. Stephen Drew was taken a couple of picks before us, eliminating any chance that we take a shortstop. It was at this point where we decided to not address the shortstop position until a couple rounds later with a guy we all like this year—Ryan Theriot.

Round Eight (Pick 107) – Matt Wieters, C, Baltimore Orioles

Brian Wilson became the first closer taken as one of the “cream filling” picks. This posed the question, do we take an elite closer now, or do we address the catcher position and hold off until the next round for a closer? We decided to go with Matt Wieters here because the options after him (Miguel Montero, Jorge Posada, Kurt Suzuki) were not as good compared to the remaining closers. Also, we need two catchers in this 15-team league so it’s important that we get one of the top 10 options.

Wieters should provide solid power and he is in a very solid lineup so there should be plenty of RBI opportunities. Plus, there’s always a chance he figures it all out and realizes his full potential, which many have pegged to be at .290/30/100. Fingers are crossed.

Round Nine (Pick 134) – Joe Nathan, RP, Minnesota Twins

Remember when I said Wilson was the first closer taken at pick 105? Well, during our 26-pick break 10 closers were taken. Talk about a run! So we missed out on a lot of the elite options, but should we still take a closer? We didn’t want to risk waiting, and missing out on the second tier so we decided to go with Joe Nathan. J.J. Putz was also available, but if you asked me who was more likely to finish the season as a top-5 closer it would be Nathan every day of the week. He was one of the game’s best closers before Tommy John surgery and we saw what Billy Wagner did last year. Despite missing out on Joakim Soria, Andrew Bailey and Heath Bell, I think we got ourselves a very decent option at a discounted price. That’s a win in my book.

Round Ten (Pick 137) – Jason Bay, OF, New York Mets

We still needed a third outfielder, but we also starting talking about a third starting pitcher. Our main options at pitching were Colby Lewis, Matt Garza, John Danks and Ricky Romero (in that order). While the first three were all on the visible page of pitchers, Danks was buried on page five. We have yet to uncover the reason why. This is when we started playing, as Chris cleverly put it, “John Danks roulette.” More on that later.

For outfielders, we are starting to hit the tier where everyone seems to have a glaring question mark. Here’s an example of some players at the top of the list: Jason Bay (concussion), Grady Sizemore (health/decreasing skills), Vernon Wells (don’t get me started), Adam Jones (untapped potential) and Carlos Quentin (health). It came down to Jones and Bay and we thought to go with the guy who gives a little more in both the home run and stolen base department. We need to make up for some power after drafting Ichiro. All reports coming out of spring training said he is feeling great (surprise!), which makes Bay is a nice candidate for a rebound season.

Round Eleven (Pick 164) – Ricky Romero, SP , Toronto Blue Jays

Round two of “John Danks roulette.” We missed out on both Lewis and Garza so we were left to decide between Romero and Danks. Now, we like Danks slightly better because he doesn’t pitch in the AL East and he has more of a track record, but the difference between the two isn’t too great so we decided to go with Romero and take the chance that Danks falls to us in the 13th round. We swear to ourselves that if he’s available we would finally pull the trigger (no pun intended) and take him.

As for Romero, there’s a lot to like as he made nice strides last year by improving his strikeout rate (7.5 K/9) and walk rate (3.5 BB/9). He is also a southpaw, which gives him a slight edge against some of the league’s top offenses. Going into his third full season, he should continue to take strides toward becoming a reliable No. 3 starting pitcher.

Round Twelve (Pick 167) – Ryan Franklin, RP, St. Louis Cardinals

Just three rounds after nabbing Nathan we decided to get our second closer and at this point the options were pretty slim. The only remaining full-time closers were Ryan Franklin, Fransisco Cordero and Brandon Lyon so we chose to go with Franklin as his job is probably safest. He doesn’t wow in any category, but he gets the job done so we can’t complain. Needless to say we needed another guy who could get 30 saves because chances are we aren’t going to start three closers every week in a 15-team league and you can’t have two part-time closers and expect to finish respectably in the saves category. You would have to get very lucky in the later rounds. By the way, Danks is still there.

Round Thirteen (Pick 194) – Neil Walker, 2B, Pittsburgh Pirates

Damn! Danks was finally taken, thus ending “John Danks roulette.” It was fun while it lasted, but now we need another plan. We decide to wait on pitching and address one of the “extra” positions—middle infield. We think about Manny Ramirez and drafting our second catcher with our two picks here, but eventually decide that the dropoff at middle infield after Neil Walker is dangerous. Walker has an outside chance to hit 20 home runs while bat .280 and hopefully score some runs by batting in front of Pedro Alvarez and the powerful Lyle Overbay. OK, so he won’t be scoring 100 runs, but I’ll take 80 and be very happy.

Round Fourteen (Pick 197) – Jhoulys Chacin, SP, Colorado Rockies

Time for our second big debate—Jhoulys Chacin vs. Brian Matusz. At first, Bryan was alone on the Chacin train, but he presented an argument that I couldn’t ignore. Both pitchers have ace potential, but one had problems with home runs and pitches in the AL East. The other induces ground balls, rarely allows a home run and pitches in the NL West. When in doubt go with the groundball pitcher, who pitches in the NL and has better strikeout potential to boot. Needless to say we welcomed Chacin to Da Professors with open arms.

Round Fifteen (Pick 224) – Ryan Theriot, 2B/SS, St. Louis Cardinals

With our 15th pick we decided to finally grab Ryan Theriot to man our shortstop position. I’m feeling really good about this pick and I’ll tell you why. He should hit in the .280-range, but could hit .300 if things go his way. Almost all of his outs happen on the field as his career 12 percent strikeout rate suggests. He will bat leadoff in a very good Cardinals lineup that features Holliday, Albert Pujols and Colby Rasums, which means 100 runs isn’t out of the question and Theriot should get to 90. All that, and he’ll give you 25-30 stolen bases, which makes him very solid in three-of-five categories. You won’t find that too often with the 224th pick in the draft. Theriot is a great guy to target if you choose to wait on the shortstop position.

Part two will come once the 30th round is complete, but until then let us know what you think of our strategies and even some of your own that you implement in deep drafts.

Roster at this point:

C – Matt Wieters

1B – Kendry Morales

2B - Aaron Hill

3B - David Wright

SS - Ryan Theriot

MI - Neil Walker

CI – N/A

OF – Matt Holliday

OF – Ichiro Suzuki

OF – Jason Bay

OF - N/A

OF - N/A

P - Jon Lester

P – Matt Cain

P – Ricky Romero

P - Jhoulys Chacin

CL - Joe Nathan

CL - Ryan Franklin

P – N/A

P - N/A

P - N/A

Read full story · Comments { 1 }

When Should You Draft Your Closers?

Even though the Celtics and Bruins are now championship contenders—just let me pretend the Bruins are contenders, OK?—I don’t like February. To help ease the pain, I spend a lot of time each day updating the content on our site, tweeting with anyone who will listen to me, going through my Google Reader feeds and contributing on various forums and message boards. It gets me by.

And that’s when I realized that forums are probably the best resource out there for anyone looking to get honest, unfiltered opinions from real baseball fans who are actually excited about the upcoming fantasy season. This revelation led to the creation of this new little series of posts we’ll be doing.

It’s pretty simple; we ask a question in a forum, get a bunch of different responses in a matter of hours (and sometimes minutes) and then compile it all here. You get great, relevant fantasy content, and I don’t have to do a lot of work. It’s a win-win!

We posted our first question on Wednesday, March 16 on the forums at Rotoworld.com:

When do you start taking closers? Do you like to get the elite guys like Mariano Rivera and Joakim Soria or are you more of a discount shopper?

The following are real responses from real people.

I don’t buy any closers without a discount. I don’t mind the chipped paint, they get the job done just fine.

Maybe I’m reading into the commenter’s tone too much, but I liked his/her seemingly calm, cool and collected approach to drafting closers. “You can have the high-priced guys. I’ll roll the dice with some of those Brandon Lyon- or Chris Perez-types. Hey, somebody’s gotta get the saves on those teams, right?” (that was me paraphrasing, of course).

My “cool story bra” nomination.
I actually won my 12 team roto last year punting closers. All my leaguemates laughed at me, said there was NO way I would finish in the top 3. It was just something in the league settings I exploited, there was no IP limit, so I just loaded up on SP & won every other pitching category. Plus it was a 7X7, don’t think it would work w/ a normal 5X5. This year, I plan to play it straight up. U get one stud, & then just fill in at the back end of draft, & keep close tabs on each teams bullpen situations.

If you subscribe to our 7-day tutorial series “7 Steps to Building a Fantasy Baseball Champion,” you’ll notice this guy uses some of our Day One advice perfectly. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, click here.

You can’t say a closer is good because he had over 40 saves. He is good for doing his job. If he blew 10 chances, he probably is not too good and I would be staying away from him.

This comment sums up the problem with saves. Soria saved 43 games and blew only three. Heath Bell was even more effective, saving 47 while blowing three. Even if their teams have fewer save opportunities, I feel confident in their abilities to pile up saves because they don’t blow many of their opportunities. That’s why they’re the elite closers.

Obviously, it depends on your league settings. Generally though, I like to look at the bottom 10 closers and see who stands out. I usually take 2 and fill in the rest as the season goes. Saves are the one category where you’re literally guaranteed to do well in if you stay up to date. I can’t remember who said this, or in what thread, but someone said on average, there is a 25% closer turnover rate during the season. I’ll have a ranking chart handy on draft day for them, but that’s about it. I don’t even consider them until round 22-24.

This guy gets into the strategy of drafting closers, and it’s hard to argue with him (in my opinion). Of course, the truest comment he made was his opening sentence: “Obviously, it depends of your league settings.” Not everyone believes bargain basement is the only way to go, though.

Depends on how many teams there are, the depth at closer drops off slower than most of the other positions, so obviously in smaller leagues I can wait longer and still get 2 solid closers. Most of my leagues are 12 or 15 teams, so I’m usually going after 1 decent top tier guy, I like Soria, Papelbon and Marmol this year, then I’m waiting for my 2nd guy to get someone like Street, Kimbrel, Storen or gamble on Nathan/Broxton if they seem like good values.

A pretty common strategy seems to be to take a top-tier guy for stability and then fill in the rest. I actually prefer this strategy if you can get a near-elite closer at a discount, and I’d take whichever slips the farthest. If you’re in a league like mine (where everyone stays away from closers early) you can really make a killing doing this.

If you’d like to chime in, post your strategies in the comments section!

Read full story · Comments { 0 }

Is Matt Cain Lucky or Good: Analyzing HR/FB Rates

Over the last few days, various reputable baseball analysis sites have been digging into the relationship between infield fly ball rates (IFFB%) and home run per fly ball rates (HR/FB). The discussion was prompted by a blog post by Rory Paap at Paapfly.com called “Matt Cain ignores xFIP, again and again,” which generated a response from Dave Cameron at Fangraphs.

Paap suggested FIP and xFIP do Cain a disservice because they don’t give him his due credit for possessing the “unique skill” of inducing harmless fly ball contact, a theory that David Pinto at Baseball Musings attempted to quantify last October. Cameron’s response included some interesting analysis that looked at the best pitchers from 2002-2007 in terms of HR/FB rate and compared their IFFB% over that span to what they posted the next three seasons. His conclusion?

Is there some skill to allowing long fly outs? Maybe. But if you can identify which pitchers are likely to keep their home run rates low while giving up a lot of fly balls before they actually do it, then you could make a lot of money in player forecasting.

Since my mind automatically places all arguments regarding statistical trends into the context of fantasy baseball, I decided to throw my hat into the ring and see if I could find a trend between IFFB% and HR/FB rate. My theory was that if IFFB% and HR/FB rate showed some sort of correlation, then plotting HR/FB rate as a function of IFFB% would show a clear inverse trend (meaning that a higher IFFB% would more likely generate a lower HR/FB rate, and vice versa).

To do this, I looked at all pitchers from 2008 to 2010 who threw at least 162 innings and plotted their IFFB% and HR/FB rate as described above. This three-year range generated 257 such data sets, and these were the results:

Note: IFFB% is on the x-axis and HR/FB rate is on the y-axis.

Just by looking at the chart, it’s tough to visually decipher any sort of trend. If there actually is an inverse relationship between IFFB% and HR/FB rates, we would expect the data points to slope from the top-left (low IFFB%, high HR/FB rate) to the bottom-right (high IFFB%, low HR/FB rate).

By adding a best-fit trend line to the data set, we see that there is a very slight slope in the direction we anticipated, but to say it shows any sort of useful relationship is a stretch. The data has an R-Squared value of just 0.0126, which tells us there was very little correlation between IFFB% and HR/FB rate. If you don’t know what R-squared is, it’s simply a representation of one variable’s ability to forecast another. R-Squared values range from 0 to 1, and the closer they are to 1 the more of a correlation there is between the two sets of data. An R-Squared value of 0.0126 between IFFB% and HR/FB rate shows very little correlation.

What conclusions can we draw from this? Perhaps it is possible to tell if a pitcher like Cain is more prone to lower HR/FB rates by virtue of his ability to induce weaker contact, but IFFB% alone is not enough to draw any conclusions. More sophisticated analysis, like that provided by Pinto’s article at Baseball Musings, might unveil some usable relationships, but we cannot simply look at Clayton Kershaw’s 4.1 percent HR/FB rate in 2009 and say his 13.5 percent IFFB% explains it. The data just doesn’t support it.

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

Impact of Pitchers Changing Leagues

Every year around this time, we hear baseball experts talk about how pitchers can expect to benefit or be harmed by switching leagues, but how much of an effect is there really?

This year there seems to be a mass exodus of big-name pitchers moving to the Senior Circuit—Cliff Lee, Zack Greinke, Shaun Marcum, Matt Garza and Javier Vazquez to name a few—so how much should we expect their stats to improve? In fantasy baseball, does this vault them up our preseason rankings or should we only value the switch as a tie-breaker between otherwise even candidates?

To answer this, I went back and looked at the ERA and K/9 for American League pitchers and National League pitchers over the last 10 seasons (since these are the two most telling and fantasy-relevant stats) to see how large the AL-NL gap has become.

YearAL ERANL ERAAL K/9NL K/9
Average4.454.276.496.86
20104.144.026.837.39
20094.454.196.867.10
20084.354.296.646.98
20074.514.436.656.70
20064.564.496.446.72
20054.364.226.166.57
20044.634.316.456.74
20034.534.286.116.65
20024.464.116.266.77
20014.484.366.447.00

Is it surprising to see that in each of the last 10 seasons the NL has had a lower ERA and a higher K/9 than the AL? Actually, yeah, I am kind of surprised. Just as we expected, the 10-year averages for ERA and K/9 certainly favor the NL, but for it to be tilted in the NL’s favor in every single season over the last decade is notable.

So, what do these differences equate to for one pitcher over the course of a season? The difference in ERA between leagues is straight-forward; NL pitchers averaged an ERA that was 18 points lower than AL pitchers. But what about strikeout totals? For a pitcher who throws 200 innings (and many of the pitchers we care about in fantasy baseball are 200-inning beasts) the difference is only eight strikeouts—144 per 200 IP in the AL and 152 per 200 IP in the NL.

Honestly, I thought the gap would be a little larger, but if you combine the drop in ERA and the slight rise in strikeouts and K/9, you do get a better overall line. Does this change the way I value a pitcher like Marcum or Garza? Absolutely not. Because these numbers only take into account one league versus the other, division strength is not accounted for. Marcum and Garza’s moves from the AL East to the NL Central represent drastic changes on two fronts; not only are they leaving the AL, but they’re also leaving the AL East. Both of these factors combine to drive up their values.

Greinke, on the other hand, might not notice that much of a difference. The AL Central isn’t exactly a power division, and it could be argued the NL Central houses better offenses with teams such as St. Louis and Cincinnati. Unlike Marcum, Greinke only gets a boost by changing leagues and not by leaving the AL Central.

Read full story · Comments { 0 }

Draft Strategy: How to Have the Perfect Draft

Let’s face it. If you have a poor draft then you have an uphill climb to the top of the standings. Sure, you can strike gold with free agent pickups or make a few prudent trades throughout the season, but the fact remains that the most important day of your season is draft day. And there’s nothing worse than coming out of the draft wanting a do-over.

To make sure this doesn’t happen to you, I thought I’d share some strategies that have worked for me in the past.

1. Identify where the steepest drop in production occurs for each position.

This is similar to tier rankings, but it goes one step further. With this approach, you look at all the tiers and identify which two tiers have the biggest drop in production between them. It is essentially a cutoff point where you draw a line after one player for each position and say, “If I don’t get at least this player, I’m not drafting this position for a while.”

Take second base for example. My “cutoff” player is Brandon Phillips. I have him ranked as my eighth best second baseman, right ahead of Jose Lopez. What this means is that if I don’t get any second basemen ranked in my top eight, I’m going to wait a few more rounds before selecting one. I’ll probably miss out on Jose Lopez and Dan Uggla, but that’s fine since I can still select Howie Kendrick or Asdrubal Cabrera later on. Their values are similar to Lopez’s and Uggla’s so I don’t lose anything there because I’ll be able to draft players who are better than the ones I’d be looking at had I drafted Lopez.

2. Load up on starting pitchers in rounds six through twelve.

I’m usually not one to draft starting pitchers early. That means I’m probably not going to have Tim Lincecum, Roy Halladay, Felix Hernandez, Zack Greinke, or C.C. Sabathia on any of my teams since they are all likely to go in the top three rounds. In the first five rounds I try to come out with a first baseman, second basemen, third baseman, shortstop, and an outfielder. This ensures that I’ll have top-end talent at every position so I’m not stuck drafting someone below my “cutoff” point (see above).

While I probably won’t have a bona fide ace on my team, I can still build a good pitching staff by making five of my next seven picks starting pitchers.

Let’s take a look at pitchers who are going in these rounds according to ESPN:

Round 6: Johan Santana, Chris Carpenter
Round 7: Yovani Gallardo, Josh Beckett
Round 8: Javier Vazquez, Josh Johnson, Tommy Hanson
Round 9: Brandon Webb
Round 10: Matt Cain, Cole Hamels, Ricky Nolasco, Jake Peavy
Round 11: Ubaldo Jimenez, John Lackey
Round 12: Wandy Rodriguez, Clayton Kershaw

If you can land five, or even four, of these guys, you will have a very good rotation on your hands. Remember, a good pitching staff cannot be top-heavy. It has to be well-rounded.

3. Don’t worry about drafting backups for every position.

A lot of people do this. It’s getting toward the end of the draft and you realize you don’t have a backup shortstop. So, when it’s your turn to pick, you scroll through the shortstop position and pick a dependable veteran with little upside.

Instead of picking someone just to fill out your roster, why not pick a young, unproven player with upside? It’s a low-risk investment since you’re not looking for this player to start. He either explodes and far exceeds his draft position or proves he’s not ready yet. If he flops you can simply drop him and replace him with a veteran who offers consistent backup-level production.

4. Wait on closers.

I don’t see a good reason to draft a closer in the first half of your draft. While the best closers have elite ERAs and better WHIPs, they don’t pitch enough innings for it to be a significant advantage. Plus, most closers have good ERAs and WHIPs anyway.

Saves are also dependent on opportunity, so it is impossible to predict which pitchers will get the most saves. Care to guess who had the most saves last year? The answer is Brian Fuentes with 48.

In addition to being unpredictable, saves can also be had throughout the draft. Last year, 16 players had 30 or more saves and 28 players had 20 or more.

So, when should I draft my closers you ask? The ideal situation is that you draft three or four closers between rounds 15 and 20.  If you do this you will emerge with inexpensive closers who have good ratios and whose jobs are safe.

5. Pay attention to other managers’ teams.

During the draft, everyone has a tendency to have a one-track mind.  You look at your team and determine you need to draft an outfielder or you need more power. However, it’s also important to pay attention to the rosters that your league-mates are constructing. This can be advantageous to maximizing value.

For example, say you have the ninth pick in a snake draft with 10 teams. It’s the fifth round, and you can’t decide if you want to draft Justin Morneau or Johan Santana. You look at the roster of the team drafting next and notice he has Miguel Cabrera but no pitchers. Since you know he is not a threat to take Morneau, you gladly select Johan knowing that you’re going to get both of the players you wanted.

Well, there you have it. These five strategies will make you walk out of draft day with your head held high.

Read full story · Comments { 2 }
  • 2012 MLB Closer Chart
  • About BaseballProf
  • 2012 Fantasy Baseball Rankings
  • xBA/xBABIP By Year
  • Contact
  • #TheseAreStats
  • 2011 Draft Preview
  • 2012 Fantasy Preview
  • Buy/Sell
  • Daily Dozen
  • Daily SP Matchup Ratings
  • Draft Strategies
  • FAAB Five
  • Player Movement
  • Podcast
  • Power Rankings
  • Professor's Blog
  • Top 100 Offseason Questions
  • Top 200 Fantasy Rankings
  • Twice is Nice
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009